Кстати, интересный тест провели:
Для просмотра ссылок или изображений в данном разделе, у Вас должно быть не менее 15 сообщение(ий). Сейчас у Вас 0 сообщение(ий).
сравнение оригинального BT AMB2300 и китайского модуля:
Цитата:
I did some bench-marking today.
I have 2 vas heads now.
A) with 3.3v,70ns RAM,Non AMB module under a amb2300 shield with genuine looking ceramic antenna.
B)now with ISSIS 5v 10ns RAM with genuine AMB2300 module.
My findings:
With USB connection:B is ~4 secs faster than A in displaying control module list using odis -S 4.2.2 from the moment i click start diagnosis.
With bluetooth connection: A is ~14 secs faster than B.For some reason third party bluetooth is faster than the genuine amb2300.Third party module has a better signal strength too.dontknow.With A i can easily connect my car(parked in my garage) from my living room but with B(genuine amb2300,i could not.
Also don't know what they did,A can take PDU updates and downgrades like a genuine one with no problem despite being non AMB.It even works with newer ODIS-E 7.2.Only draw back is i can't change buzzer and power down settings with it.But signal and speed wise,its better than genuine AMB.
|
Неоднозначно......